Legal Opinion
In Re Carlos
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California
Decided October 28, 1997No. Bankruptcy LA 97-31026 SBPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FIRST AMENDED OPINION ON MOTION BY SEARS TO WITHDRAW MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF REAFFIRMATION AGREEMENT AND ON VALIDITY OF SEARS SECURITY INTEREST
SAMUEL L. BUFFORD, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The underlying motion, brought by Sears, Roebuck & Co. (“Sears”) for approval of a reaffirmation between it and the debtors, raises three issues. The first issue is whether Sears has a valid security interest in the washing machine, television and VCR at issue in the reaffirmation agreement, to support the reaffirmation agreement. The second issue is whether Sears has standing to withdraw the approval…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank of RoanokeSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Long v. BullardSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Long and Wife v. BullardSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Whitehouse v. LaRocheCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- In Re KampsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1998
- BankBoston, N.A. v. Claflin (In Re Claflin)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2000
- In Re FellheimerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- In re ChimkoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.