Legal Opinion

Rex Refining Co. v. Morris

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 22, 1934No. 11772PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES; Chief Justice.

On a suit filed in a district court of Dallas county, appellees secured the appointment of a temporary receiver, to take charge and control of appellant’s property. Appellant appealed from the order appointing the receiver, and on such appeal the order of the trial court was reversed and the receiver dismissed, on the ground that the facts alleged in the petition were insufficient to show the necessity of a receivership., 72 S.W.(2d) 687, 692. A mandate was issued from this court on August 20, 1934, and directed that the properties- and assets belonging to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rex Refining Co., Inc. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Espuela Land & Cattle Co. v. BindleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Payne v. Little Motor Kar Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Evans v. SwartzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Archer v. RossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Prudential Insurance v. ByrdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Kuteman v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Strayhorn v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API