Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 24, 1897PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Palo Pinto.' Tried below before Hon. D. M. Hood. '

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS,

Associate Justice.—This is a case in which the shipper of cattle between two points in Texas undertook by special contract to feed and water and take care of them at his own risk and expense. After the cattle were loaded at Atlanta, Texas, destined for shipment over appellant’s line, of railway to Weatherford, Texas, the owner, appellee Arnold, placed them in charge of G. V. Crawford and A. M. Dodd, but instructed them not to water and feed the cattle while in transit, the run between the two points named not being a very long one-. But he train was delayed, and the conductor at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. DaggettTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Keeney v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Humble Exploration Co., Inc. v. Walker, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1982
  2. Shell Petroleum Corporation v. GraysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. of Texas v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Payne v. Little Motor Kar Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API