Day v. W a Foote Memorial Hospital
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
We granted leave to appeal to consider whether the conclusive presumption of a widow’s dependency on her husband for financial support set forth in the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act is an unconstitutional gender-based discrimination because there is no similar presumption for widowers.
After oral argument in this Court, the United States Supreme Court decided Wengler v Druggists Mutual Ins Co, 446 US 142; 100 S Ct 1540; 64 L Ed 2d 107 (1980), which held that language of Missouri’s workers’ compensation law providing for a similar conclusive presumption of dependency of widows was an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Wengler v. Druggists Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Miller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Arp v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Insurance Co. of North America v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Hewitt v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Murphy v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Riley v. Northland Geriatric CenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Weems v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.