Legal Opinion · Dissent

Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. King Consolidated Ditch Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 14, 2011No. 09SA374Published

1DissentJustice Rice

In enacting the Water Right Determination and Administration Act of 1969, §§ 37-*124192-101 to -602, C.R.S. (2010) ("WRDAA"), the General Assembly sought to create a workable mechanism for adjudicating water rights in Colorado by relaxing the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure for a limited subset of water matters. The legislature, however, carefully cireumseribed the seope of the matters adjudicable under the WRDAA's relaxed resume-notice procedures to ensure due process for the state's water rights holders. By expanding the seope of the term "determination of a water right" to encompass the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. Matter of NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. United States v. District Court in & for Water Division No. 5Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. Moffett v. Life Care Centers of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API