Legal Opinion

Callis v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 20, 1997No. 39A04-9606-CR-252PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHEZEM, Judge.

Case Summary 1 , 2

Appellant-Defendant, Brent Callis (“Cal-lis”), appeals his conviction for Voluntary Manslaughter, a class A felony. 3 We affirm.

Issues

Callis raises six issues for our review that we restate as:

I. Whether the exclusion of his attorney from a polygraph interview violated his right to counsel guaranteed by Indiana Const, art. I, § 13;

II. Whether the polygraph interviews violated his right against self-incrimination guaranteed by U.S. Constitution amend. V, and Indiana Const, art. I, § 14;

III. Whether the trial court properly limited the testimony of his…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DiGiambattistaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Willey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. William A. Sanders v. Zettie CottonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Badelle v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API