Callis v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHEZEM, Judge.
Case Summary 1 , 2
Appellant-Defendant, Brent Callis (“Cal-lis”), appeals his conviction for Voluntary Manslaughter, a class A felony. 3 We affirm.
Issues
Callis raises six issues for our review that we restate as:
I. Whether the exclusion of his attorney from a polygraph interview violated his right to counsel guaranteed by Indiana Const, art. I, § 13;
II. Whether the polygraph interviews violated his right against self-incrimination guaranteed by U.S. Constitution amend. V, and Indiana Const, art. I, § 14;
III. Whether the trial court properly limited the testimony of his…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DiGiambattistaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Willey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- William A. Sanders v. Zettie CottonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Badelle v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.