Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ho Yeaon Seo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 14, 2014No. 1D12-3179Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBenton, J.

I respectfully dissent from that portion of the decision affirming Mr. Seo’s convic*1191tion, because I believe he was entitled to the jury instruction on entrapment that he requested. But, since a majority has voted to uphold the conviction, I concur in affirming on the state’s cross-appeal challenging the downward departure sentence. See State v. Davis, 141 So.3d 1230 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

There was, to be sure, evidence from which the jury could find that Mr. Seo was guilty of the charged offenses. But the rule regarding instructions on affirmative defenses is that in “determining the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Munoz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. Langston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  5. Farley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API