Legal Opinion
People v. Ramirez
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 14, 1960No. Crim. 7078PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
The appellant, Joe Ramirez, was accused by information of the crime of possession of heroin in violation of section 11500, Health and Safety Code. He waived his right to trial by jury and was found guilty. This appeal is from the denial of his motion for a new trial and from the judgment. While Isabel Ramirez was also convicted of the offense and filed a notice of appeal, she has failed to prosecute her appeal and it has been dismissed.
On this appeal, the evidence is to be viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution. (People v. Newland, 15 Cal.2d 678, 681 [104 P.2d 778]; People v.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. LeibCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. TenneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.