Legal Opinion

People v. Tenney

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1972No. Crim. 9386PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOLINARI, P. J.

Following the denial of his motion to suppress evidence made pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5, defendant entered a plea of guilty to violation of Health and Safety Code section 11530 reserving his right to appeal from the denial of the motion as provided in Penal Code section 1538.5, subdivision (m). Imposition of sentence was suspended and defendant was placed on probation for the period of three years on condition that he serve six months in the county jail. Defendant appeals from the order denying his motion to suppress pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5 and…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Burrows v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. United States v. Enrique EspinosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. People v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. ManningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. People v. LeibCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API