Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Burden

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 2, 1931No. Nos. 26, 27PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The issues presented on this appeal were disposed of in Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Burden, 30 F.(2d) 610, except that since our decision an application was made in the District Court to remand the case to the state court, which was denied. The cause was removed to the federal eourt because of the claimed existence of a diversity of citizenship and the requisite amount involved in the controverey giving jurisdiction to the court. The appellant proceeded to trial on the merits without protest. The court below held that this was an acquiescence in the jurisdiction of the person so as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. MacKay v. Uinta Development Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Bailey v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. BurdenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lopata v. HandlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. Lapoint v. Mid-Atlantic Settlement Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API