Legal Opinion

Davis v. RiverSource Life Insurance Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 21, 2017No. Case No. 16-cv-02801-JSWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

JEFFREY S. WHITE, United States District Judge

Now pending before the Court is Defendants RiverSource Life Insurance Company (“RiverSource”) and Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc.’s (“Ameriprise”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Paul M. Davis’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Having carefully reviewed all parties’ papers and considered the arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court finds that all pending motions are appropriate for decision without oral argument. See N.D. Cal.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  2. Waters Edge Wineries, Inc. v. Wine Vibes, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API