Estate of Gonzalez v. Hickman
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ENGLAND, District Judge.
Through the present action, the Estate of Correctional Officer Miguel Gonzalez, together with Officer Gonzalez’ minor chil dren (“Plaintiffs”), allege that Roderick Q. Hickman, Jeanne S. Woodford, Suzanne Hubbard, John Dovey, Lori Di Carlo, Carol Roddy, Gregory Mellott and Wendy Still (“Defendants”) deprived Officer Gonzalez of his civil rights in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 1 Neither the State of California nor the California Institution for Men (“CIM”) are parties to the present action.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Green v. MansourSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allen v. WoodfordDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Allen v. WoodfordDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- People v. ThainNew York Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. University of MassachusettsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016