Legal Opinion
Allen v. Woodford
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 20, 2008No. 1:05-cv-1104PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
GARY S. AUSTIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On December 13, 2007, Plaintiff Brenda Allen filed the instant motion to compel the production of documents, which were requested pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45, through subpoenas issued on May 24, 2007, and June 7, 2007. The subpoenas were directed to the following non-parties: (1) the Custodian of Records of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) Office of Legal Affairs; (2) the Custodian of Records at the CDCR Office of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Acuna-Martinez v. C.O.District Court, D. Nevada · 2024
- Kee v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010