Legal Opinion

People v. Jackson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 30, 2009No. 1-07-2244PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

The only question before us is whether the handgun recovered by a police officer was lawfully seized. The trial court, after reconsideration, granted the defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence. This is an appeal of that ruling by the State, as authorized by Supreme Court Rule 604(a)(1) (210 Ill. 2d R. 604(a)(1)). We affirm the trial court.

FACTS

On November 25, 2006, the defendant was arrested by Chicago police officers and was charged with felony unlawful possession of a handgun.

The defendant filed a motion to quash his arrest and suppress the handgun (motion to suppress). The motion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. People v. LuedemannIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. GhernaIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. CosbyIllinois Supreme Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Rafeal E.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  2. People v. ShippAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  3. People v. CherryAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  4. People v. MarshallAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. In re Rafeal E.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API