Legal Opinion

Burns's Contested Election

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1934No. Appeal, 79PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

At the general election held November 7, 1933, Daniel Burns was returned elected to the office of mayor of the City of New Kensington. A number of voters of the city filed a petition to contest his election, whereupon the court below set a date for hearing, and ordered that a bond conditioned for the payment of costs be filed by the petitioners within ten days, as required by the Act of May 19, 1874, P. L. 208, as amended by the Act of April 28, 1899, P. L. 118. When the case came on for hearing, respondent moved to dismiss the petition and discharge the rule…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Appeal of HackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  2. Moritz's Contested ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Huron L. Co., Ltd. v. SklarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of EverettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  2. Olshansky v. Montgomery County Election BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Miller Election Contest CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. McChesney's Contested ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Thorne v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API