Huron L. Co., Ltd. v. Sklar
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Drew, J.,
Plaintiff, a Canadian corporation, instituted an action of replevin in the court below for the recovery of a certain shipment of leather of the alleged value of $1,000. A bond in the amount of $2,000 was filed, as required by Section 1 of the Replevin Act of April 19, 1901, P. L. 88, signed by plaintiff corporation by Lester Bowman, its attorney, who signed as attorney-in-fact, and by a surety company. The commonly accepted abbreviation of a seal — “(L. S.)” — appeared following the signature of plaintiff corporation, but the corporate seal of plaintiff was not attached.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hamborsky v. Magyar Presbyterian ChurchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Moritz's Contested ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Page v. Williamsport Suspender Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Steinman v. FeldserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
3Cited by9 opinions
- Collins v. Tracy Grill & Bar Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Susquehanna County Auditors' ReportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Com., for Use v. PerrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. OseniderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- York Ice MacHinery Corp. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.