Holland v. Marquette Casualty Co.

I concur with the excellently written and reasoned majority opinion that the judgment should be affirmed as against the special (or borrowing) employer, and that in view of its undoubted liability for compensation payments, penalties and attorneys’ fees should be assessed against it for arbitrary non-payment of compensation due. I am unable to agree, however, that *887the general or true employer should be relieved of its direct liability (solidary with that of the special employer) to its own employee for injuries sustained in the course of his employment.

Insofar as the disabled employee is…