Legal Opinion

Scott v. Steinberger

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1923No. 24,014PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery district court; Joseph W. Holdren, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

George W. Scott brought this action against Paul Steinberger and George Steinberger to recover a balance alleged to be due for gas obtained by them from plaintiff’s land which they held under a lease. Judgment in favor of plaintiff was awarded, and defendants appeal.

The decision of the case turns upon a construction of the following paragraph of the lease:

“Party of the second part shall deliver to the credit of party of the first part free of cost in the pipe fines to which he may connect his wells one-eighth of all oil produced and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Barton v. Laclede Oil & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. Superior Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  2. Wall v. United Gas Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  3. Sternberger v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  4. Matzen v. Hugoton Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. Kretni Development Co. v. Consolidated Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API