Legal Opinion

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Hock

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1886PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph B. Gaby, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cbaig

This was a proceeding instituted by the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Eailway Company, in the Superior Court of Cook county, to condemn, for railroad purposes, lot 7, block 18, in Carpenter’s addition to Chicago, under the law of eminent domain. The title to the property was in William P. Hock, and Wilhelmina Hock, his wife. Others, who were made parties to the proceeding, claim an interest in or lien on the premises. All the parties, in open court, waived a jury, and agreed to a trial of the cause by the court. The court heard the evidence, and entered on the record a finding and judgment,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lee v. TillotsonNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  2. St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute Railroad v. CappsIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Bowman v. Venice & Carondelet Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ranck v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Blincoe v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  3. Metropolitan West Side Elevated Railroad v. SiegelIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Braun v. Metropolitan West Side Elevated RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Wabash Railroad Co. v. Coon Run Drainage & Levee DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API