Jamie Heineck v. Daniel Katz
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtPhilip M. Hess, Presiding Judge
Introduction
Daniel Katz (Appellant) appeals the default judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. The trial court ordered Appellant to pay Jamie Heineck (Respondent) damages in the amount of $12,000 for breach of contract. On appeal, Appellant argues that the trial court erred by granting Respondent’s motion for default judgment because the trial court did not have personal jurisdiction over Appellant, and Appellant was never properly served with process. Additionally, Appellant argues that he was not required to file a motion to set aside the default judgment in order to confer…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barney v. SuggsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Cotleur v. DanzigerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Worley v. WorleySupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Vonsmith v. VonsmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Crouch v. CrouchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bramer v. AbstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Hoeman Capital Management v. David Robinson and 7 R Farm CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025
- MARCK INDUSTRIES, INC., and RL TRANSPORT, LLC v. CATHY LOWE and BILLY ROUSEMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019