Legal Opinion

Graham v. Hamilton County

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided March 31, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 4821Published

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK W. WILSON, District Judge.

OPINION

This is an action for “reverse condemnation”, wherein the plaintiffs seek damages for alleged destruction of an easement of way. Plaintiffs allege that they are citizens of Georgia and other foreign staes and are owners of real property situated in Dade County, Georgia. It is their complaint that the State of Tennessee has, by the construction of Interstate Highway 24, substantially destroyed plaintiffs’ right of access over Windy Gap Road to Tennessee Highway 134. The case is before the Court upon the motion of defendant, a political subdivision of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. In Re AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Petty v. Tennessee-Missouri Bridge CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Lincoln County v. LuningSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Poindexter v. GreenhowSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API