State v. Oakes
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
This is a state appeal from a circuit court order suppressing both an oral confession and evidence seized as a result of that confession.
After being indicted for burglary in the first degree (ORS 164.225), defendant moved to suppress from evidence statements he had made to the police as well as allegedly stolen property subsequently seized. This motion was made on the grounds (1) that defendant had not been advised of his contitutional rights prior to questioning, and (2) that the statements were not voluntary because officers had threatened to prosecute a friend for the same crime without…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BurdickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- State v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. MathiasonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984