Legal Opinion

Farr v. Fisher

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 7, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Buttles, Supr. J.

This is an action in tort to recover for personal injuries received by the plaintiff as a result of being struck while walking in the highway, by an automobile owned and driven by the defendant. The accident occurred shortly after five o’clock in the afternoon of December 6, 1933, just inside the limits of the village of Bellows Falls, Vermont, on the street known as Saxton’s River Street. The plaintiff was walking northerly or easterly on his right side of the highway toward the Village of Bellows Falls when he was struck from the rear by the defendant’s car which was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  3. Parizo v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  4. Dyer v. LalorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
  5. Button v. KnightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Collins v. FoggSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  2. Sawyer v. EwenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
  3. James Turner & Sons v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Viens v. LanctotSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  5. Giroux v. LussierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API