Legal Opinion

Garfield Oil Co. v. Champlin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1924No. 12686PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MAXEY, C.

This case has been elaborately briefed by both parties, and was ably argued orally before this division of the Commission, and their briefs and oral argument have aided us a great deal in arriving at a decision in this case. The plaintiff in error has assigned 13 points as error which it claims the trial court committed. These various points are discussed under appropriate heads in the brief, and we will take them up in their order. The first point discussed is stated thus:

“The record on this appeal presents a materially different state of facts from that before the court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Frank Oil Co. v. Belleview Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Wabash R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Champlin v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  2. Camp v. Black Gold Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Worrell v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Lucky Thirteen Oil Syndicate v. BarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API