Lucky Thirteen Oil Syndicate v. Barrett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentMcNEILL, J.
I am unable to concur. I take a different view in this case from that expressed in the majority opinion. It is my opinion that the court is attempting to write and substitute another and different contract than that which was entered into by the lessor and lessee, and thereby render nugatory a condition precedent incorporated in the oil and gas lease in question. The instrument is a drilling contract, incorporated in an oil and gas lease, on form 88, well known to the oil operators in the Mid-Oontinent Field. The parties to the original lease were W. S. Barrett and wife, lessors, and the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Frank Oil Co. v. Belleview Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Superior Oil & Gas Co. v. MehlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Northwestern Oil & Gas Co. v. BranineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Garfield Oil Co. v. ChamplinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Investors' Utility Corp. v. ChallacombeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.