Legal Opinion
Arie SHAAR; Helina Shaar; Shay Moshe Shaar, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 15, 1998No. 96-70619Published
1Opinion of the Court
141 F.3d 953
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2764, 98 Daily Journal
D.A.R. 3803
Arie SHAAR; Helina Shaar; Shay Moshe Shaar, Petitioners,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 96-70619.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 7, 1997.
Decided April 15, 1998.
Russell L. Marshak, Popkin, Shamir & Golan, Los Angeles, California, for petitioners/appellants.
Bridgid E. Dowdal and Hugh G. Mullane, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, DC, for respondent.
Petition for Review of Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. INS. Nos. Ajf-wwr-xze…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.