Legal Opinion

Waterman v. Conard

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided August 13, 2019No. 5:19-cv-03093Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS BRIAN MICHAEL WATERMAN, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 19-3093-SAC JACOB CONARD, et al., Defendants. O R D E R On August 6, 2019, the court issued an order granting plaintiff in forma pauperis status, directing plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing fee, granting plaintiff’s motion to amend on the condition that a complete amended complaint be filed by September 13, 2019, and directing plaintiff to show cause by September 20, 2019 why the court should not abstain and stay all significant or substantive action pending the completion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Mounkes v. ConklinDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  3. Glaser v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API