Bily v. Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & Review
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Horace Stern,
A reversal here is imperative because the court below disregarded the ever increasing trend in procedural law to recognize the real parties in interest as the actual litigants and to grant them a status as such on the record.
The owners of a property in Pittsburgh appealed from a 1913 triennial assessment to the Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review. Plaintiff, a mortgagee of this property, instituted foreclosure proceedings and purchased the property at sheriff’s sale, at which time she was required to pay all the taxes levied against it for the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ladd v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Loughborough v. McNevinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Susquehanna Collieries Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- In re the Estate of RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Brown v. T. W. Phillips Gas and Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Dash v. Wilap Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Darlington v. Reilly, TrusteeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth ex rel. Chidsey v. Keystone Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Keener v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Millcreek TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.