Legal Opinion

In re a Subpoena, Dated October 2, 1987 Issued to: Painewebber Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 14, 1987No. M8-85PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge.

The motion for a protective order and the cross-motion for a continuance of the depo*353sition of the nonparty witness, PaineWebber Incorporated, are disposed of as follows:

The Court has examined the record of the deposition thus far taken, consisting of 186 pages of stenographic transcript said to have consumed approximately six hours of time and accompanied with some 1600 pages of documentary disclosure by the witness.

These discovery proceedings are being conducted in this District in connection with two litigations pending in Ohio. Action # 1 was commenced…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adams v. The Co Op City Department of Public SafetyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  2. IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. v. PSI Resources, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API