Legal Opinion

Ray, III v. Ropes & Gray LLP

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 25, 2015No. 14-1003PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

John H. Ray III, at the time an associate at the Boston law firm of Ropes & Gray (“Ropes”), was informed in December 2008 that Ropes would not advance him for further consideration as a partner. Contending that the employer’s decision was the result of racial discrimination, and that Ropes retaliated against Ray in various ways after he filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), Ray filed an action pursuant to Title VII in federal district court. After the district court granted summary judgment to Ropes on the discrimination claim, the…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Theodore L. Leblanc v. Great American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Theriault v. Genesis Healthcare LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  2. Theidon v. Harvard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  3. Audette v. Town of PlymouthCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  4. Stratton v. Bentley UniversityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024
  5. Caraballo-Caraballo v. Administracion de CorreccionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API