Legal Opinion

Pintar v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1963No. 9864PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Joseph Pintar seeks review of an order of the Industrial Commission denying him medical expenses and temporary disability compensation for injury to his back allegedly resulting from working in the coal mine of defendant Columbia-Geneva Steel Division, United States Steel, at Dragerton, Utah.

Plaintiff identifies two separate injuries to his back. On March 29, 1961, while doing some timbering in the mine he felt a sharp pain in his back. For this he was hospitalized for four days. On July 25, 1961, he again hurt his back when he was pushed against the wall of the mine by a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Utah-Idaho Central R. Co. v. Ind. Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Edlund v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSIONUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Burton v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Allen v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Carling v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Brunson v. StrongUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Schmidt v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Sabo's Electronic Service v. SaboUtah Supreme Court · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API