Legal Opinion

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 3, 1949No. 4567PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of a violation of the Full Switching Crew Law of Arkansas, 1 in that the appellant’s switching crew in the City of Osceola consisted of an engineer, fireman, conductor and only two brakemen, whereas the State contends that three brakemen are required by the said law, the germane portions of which read:

“No railroad company or corporation owning or operating any yards or terminals in the cities within this State, where switching, pushing or transferring of cars are made across public crossings within the city limits of the cities shall operate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Order of Railway Conductors of America v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. LittleIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. George v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Harley v. Louisville & N. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Tennessee · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hope v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API