Legal Opinion
Town of Bourne v. Plante
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 9, 1999PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
We granted the plaintiffs’ application for direct appellate review in this case to consider the propriety of a preliminary injunction entered in the Superior Court. The injunction enjoined the defendants, Ernest A. Plante, Jr., ar.d Dolores A. Plante (defendants), and the intervener, the Woods Hole, *330Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority (Authority), from using the property at 169 Clay Pond Road in Bourne under a lease to provide weekend parking for patrons using the Authority’s services. We conclude that the preliminary injunction must be vacated.
The background of the case is as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Village on the Hill, Inc. v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Ballantine v. Town of FalmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- County Commissioners v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- City of New Bedford v. New Bedford, Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Massachusetts Port Authority v. Clerk of the East Boston District CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Town of Boxford v. Massachusetts Highway DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Martha's Vineyard Land Bank Commission v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Native Village of Eklutna v. Alaska RailroadAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Greater Lawrence Sanitary District v. Town of North AndoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. City of SomervilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.