Legal Opinion

Village on the Hill, Inc. v. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 12, 1964PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

These two cases grow out of the authority’s eminent domain taking of land of the plaintiff (Village) in the Brighton district of Boston in connection with extending the Massachusetts turnpike to Boston. The first ease, a bill primarily for declaratory relief, alleges that the takings were illegal and part of a plan by the authority and a defendant in the equity suit, Rivett Lathe & Grinder, Inc. (Rivett), to deprive Village of its property for the benefit of Rivett. The bill also seeks injunctive relief concerning the relocation (on or near Village’s property) of a private way known as Newton…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Spiegel v. Beacon Participations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Luke v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  3. Chesarone v. Pinewood Builders, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  4. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  5. Nickols v. Commissioners of Middlesex CountyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bowers v. Board of Appeals of MarshfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  2. Cullen v. Building Inspector of North AttleboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  3. Moskow v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. Commonwealth v. LeonardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. Hallenborg v. Town Clerk of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API