Legal Opinion

United States v. Allen

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 12, 1923No. 232PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OE CLAIMS. Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims awarding a sum as ádditional pay to a yeoman of the Coast Guard.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice. McKenna

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Action for $600.00 based on the claim of Allen, who was a yeoman in the'Coast Guard,-for pay at the rate fixed by law for a chief yeoman in the Navy from April 6, 1917, to May 28, 1919, under the following provisions of the Act of May 22, 1917, c.. 20, 40 Stat. 84: “An Act Totem-porarily increase the commissioned and warrant and enlisted strength of the Navy and Marine Corps, and for other purposes.” Section 15: “. ... That during the continuance of the present war, warrant officers, petty officers and enlisted men of the United-States…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923
  2. Beirlein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
  3. Campbell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
  4. Cranmer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API