Advanced Health Care, Inc. v. Guscott

¶1 Arthur Guscott appeals the superior court’s in limine exclusion of his three expert witnesses’ causation testimonies and its resultant summary judgment dismissal of his tort counterclaims against Advanced Health Care Inc. (AHC), which had sued him for failure to pay for services. He argues that the superior court (1) erroneously ruled that his experts’ testimonies did not meet the Frye test1 and misapplied the Frye test by requiring scientific proof that every aspect of his experts’ causation opinions was not novel; (2) should have instead applied the Daubert test2 to evidence supporting…