Procopio v. Wilkie
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge Lourie.
Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge O'Malley.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge Chen, in which Circuit Judge Dyk joins.
Moore, Circuit Judge.
*1373 Alfred Procopio, Jr., appeals a decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims denying service connection for prostate cancer and diabetes mellitus as a result of exposure to an herbicide agent, Agent Orange, during his Vietnam Warera service in the United States Navy. Because we hold that the unambiguous language of 38 U.S.C. § 1116 entitles Mr. Procopio to a presumption of service…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Nova v. Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Procopio v. Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- American Residential Holdings, LLC v. JTB Investments LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Andrew U.D. Straw v. Robert L. WilkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2020
- Austin v. WilkieCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.