Legal Opinion

Silvia v. Scotten

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 23, 1923No. 37PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolcott, Chancellor,

delivering the opinion of the court:

The question before us involves the construction of that portion of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1917 (Chap. 233, Vol. 29, Laws of Del.), which deals with the liability of an alleged tort-feasor to answer in damages for the death of an employee whose widow and dependents have accepted compensation from the deceased’s employer, the alleged tort-feasor being a person other than the employer. The portion of the act with which we are concerned is, as follows:

“319311. Section 131. Whenever an injury for which compensation is payable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hall v. Henry Thayer & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. McGarvey v. Independent Oil & Grease Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. People v. CraycroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal RailwaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Kennedy v. Delaware Cotton Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1903

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Moeser v. ShunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Frank C. Sparks Co. v. Huber Baking Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
  3. Munro v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Artificial Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. WaltzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Froid v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API