Legal Opinion

United States v. Javier Montes-Ruiz

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 21, 2014No. 12-50398PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:

Javier Montes-Ruiz appeals the district court’s decision to impose its sentence to run consecutively to an anticipated, but not-yet-imposed, federal sentence in a separate case. The United States (Government) counters that the appeal was rendered moot when the second sentencing court independently ordered that its sentence run consecutively to the first sentence. Montes-Ruiz also argues that the district court erred by sentencing him to a term of twenty-four months’ incarceration for his violation of supervised release, without crediting the time he served for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Shell Offshore, Inc. v. Greenpeace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Miranda v. AnchondoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Setser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. United States v. James Earl MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Gregory ObeyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Benjamin KoziolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. Almonte-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. Pierre WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Roger Campbell, IICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API