Legal Opinion

Bonta' v. Burke

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 2002No. C037609PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAYE, J.

The difficult question posed by this case is whether the State of California (State) has a claim for reimbursement of Medi-Cal expenses against the beneficiaries of real property conveyed to them by a recipient of health services who had retained a life estate in the property and the right to revoke their interest. The trial court granted the beneficiaries a summary judgment against the State, concluding that the property was not part of the decedent’s estate at the time of her death. We reverse.

Facts

In 1994 Lennie J. Smith executed a grant deed granting a fee simple interest…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tennant v. John Tennant Memorial HomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Belshe v. HopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Bucholtz v. BelsheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of GullbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Hines v. Department of Public AidAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Gonzalez v. City Nat'l Bank, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Hines v. Department of Public AidAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. Hines v. Dept. of Public AidAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API