Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Walden

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 12, 1951No. 17534PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

Since the trial court granted a nonsuit, it is necessary that the evidence of the plaintiff be examined to ascertain whether or not a prima facie case was made for the recovery of the land. All of the parties claim title under the common propositus, Elijah McGriff. Title is shown in Elijah Mc-Griff by warranty deed from J. E. Smith. The plaintiff introduced testimony showing the genealogy of his intestate as alleged in the action of ejectment. Applying the rules of inheritance to the plaintiff’s evidence, Elijah McGriff’s two heirs at law, William McGriff, his son, and Patience…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bowman v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Morgan v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Bennett v. Southern Pine Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Morrison v. WhitesideSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Union Central Life Insurance v. Bank of TignallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fuller v. McBurrowsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  2. Miles v. BlantonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  3. Lindsey v. LindseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. Reliance Equities, LLC v. Specialty Equity Partners, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. Miles v. BlantonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API