McKenney v. Quality Foods, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries resulting from a fall in defendant’s grocery store. The cause was tried before a jury which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the judgment and it is defendant’s theory on this appeal that the evidence is insufficient, as a matter of law, to establish any negligence on its part; that the court erred in denying defendant’s motions and in its instructions to the jury.
Defendant corporation operates a grocery store of the supermarket type in the Stonestown shopping center near San Francisco.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hatfield v. Levy BrothersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Tuttle v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Louie v. Hagstrom's Food Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Girvetz v. Boys' Market, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1949
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mahoney v. JC Penney CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Williamson v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1959
- Craddock v. Kmart Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Farrier v. LevinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Anthony (Tony) Bitsos v. Red Owl Stores, Inc., Anthony (Tony) Bitsos v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.