Legal Opinion

McKenney v. Quality Foods, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 1957No. Civ. 17528PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries resulting from a fall in defendant’s grocery store. The cause was tried before a jury which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the judgment and it is defendant’s theory on this appeal that the evidence is insufficient, as a matter of law, to establish any negligence on its part; that the court erred in denying defendant’s motions and in its instructions to the jury.

Defendant corporation operates a grocery store of the supermarket type in the Stonestown shopping center near San Francisco.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. Levy BrothersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Tuttle v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Louie v. Hagstrom's Food Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Girvetz v. Boys' Market, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1949

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. JC Penney CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Williamson v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Craddock v. Kmart Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Farrier v. LevinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Anthony (Tony) Bitsos v. Red Owl Stores, Inc., Anthony (Tony) Bitsos v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API