Legal Opinion

Buffalo Industrial Bank v. De Marzio

Buffalo City Court

Decided May 4, 1937PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSummers, J.

The bank is suing as the holder of a note which had its inception in a conditional sales contract between the seller, the Pioneer Air Conditioning Company, and the buyer (defendant).

The facts run thus: The seller conferred with the buyer, delivered an oil stove to his flat. The proposed sale was then submitted to the credit department of the bank. The bank approved and gave the seller the form of conditional sales note contract used in this *743transaction. This form has on it, in heavy, readable letters at the top, the name of the bank. Among other blanks filled in in the form was the statement…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Unico v. OwenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. Mutual Finance Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Morgan v. Reasor Corp.California Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Geiger Finance Co. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. White System of New Orleans, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API