Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph Micciche, Sr.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 30, 1975No. 75--1220PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The four appellants challenge their conviction by a jury of conspiring to knowingly and fraudulently transfer and conceal assets in contemplation of a bankruptcy proceeding and with intent to defeat the bankruptcy law. 18 U.S.C. § 152. The sole issue raised is sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm the convictions of appellants Frank Douglas Ward and Johnnie Slingerland, but reverse those of Paul Jarnigan and Joseph Micciche, Sr.

There was clearly sufficient evidence to support the convictions of Ward and Slingerland. Government witness-William Wilson testified that he, Ward, and Slingerland…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Earl Guy, United States of America v. Eugene "Mike" Peters, United States of America v. Tommy RaymondCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  2. Lawrence Harold Wood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Francis P. DavisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. Frank Douglas Ward and Johnnie Lee SlingerlandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Eugene Henry GuilianoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Long ElkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. George W. CadyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API