Fjeseth v. New York Life Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
This court has often stated that summary judgment should not be granted when there are substantial issues of fact to be determined, when the evidence on a material issue is in conflict, and there are permissible inferences from undisputed facts that would permit a different result.
In several respects the record on the motion for summary judgment is uncertain so that inferences must be drawn, and there are substantial issues of fact that are not established. It is not clear from the record whether or not Mr. Fjeseth read the supplemental application for insurance and the amendment to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parish v. Awschu Properties, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Demirjian v. New York Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Bergman v. BernsdorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Bradach v. New York Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Gibson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. First Mortgage InvestorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Thompson v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. ConwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Hein v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Zepczyk v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.