Legal Opinion

Newhouse v. Dipner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1935No. Appeal, 210PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

The plaintiff, on December 2, 1933, filed an action in assumpsit against the defendant, to recover the sum of three hundred ($300) dollars commission for the sale of defendant’s farm on the 28th day of April, 1933.

The plaintiff was engaged as a real estate broker for the years 1932 and 1933, and as such obtained a license from the Department of Public Instruction for said years, as required under the Act of May 1, 1929, P. L. 1216 (63 PS 431, et seq.). She did not pay a license tax to the county treasurer for the year 1932, and did not pay her license tax for the year…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Verona v. Schenley Farms Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Luce v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Lessy v. FletcherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Gonnelli, Jr. v. MagazzuSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burns v. Gartzman Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Kusche v. Vulcanized Rubber & Plastics Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Commonwealth v. Donovan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1941
  4. Pawnbrokers' License Tax, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1939
  5. Shannon & Luchs Company, and Warren K. Montouri, Inc. v. Mellon Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API