Legal Opinion

Kusche v. Vulcanized Rubber & Plastics Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1965No. Appeal, No. 368PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on the pleadings in an action of assumpsit.

The pertinent portions of the pleadings are as follows :

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff, with many years experience in banldng and negotiating loans, entered into a contract with the corporate-defendant “to negotiate a mortgage loan of |500,000 on behalf of the defendant at a fee of 3%, payable to the plaintiff by the defendant;” that the plaintiff successfully secured *366a commitment for such a loan from a Philadelphia hank, which was submitted to the board of directors of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Verona v. Schenley Farms Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Alford v. RaschiatoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Schultz v. Palmer Welloct Tool Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  4. Newhouse v. DipnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Schultz v. Palmer Welloct Tool Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burke v. IsraelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Wilkins v. HeebnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Kreider v. KleinfelterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Shannon & Luchs Company, and Warren K. Montouri, Inc. v. Mellon Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. Wilkins v. HeebnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API