Legal Opinion

Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. Petrie

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1923PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMccarthy, J.

— Respondent is an irrigation district. Appellants are owners of certain lands of the district. The district entered into a contract with the United States government for three main purposes: (1) to build a drainage system for the district, (2) to furnish full water rights for about 40,000 acres of dry land in the district and (3) to furnish a supplemental supply of stored water from the Arrowrock reservoir to be used upon some lands within the district. The validity of this contract and all proceedings in connection therewith was confirmed by a decree of the district court, affirmed by this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Myles Salt Co. v. Board of Comm'rs of Iberia and St. Mary Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Burt v. Farmers' Co-Operative Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1917
  3. McCarty v. Boise City Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. PetrieIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Bissett v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Baker v. Ore-Ida Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Stephenson v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Seidlitz v. County of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Kunz v. Utah Power & Light Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Albrethson v. Carey Valley Reservoir Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API