Legal Opinion

Shapiro v. Neiditz

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 21, 1949No. File 83046Published

1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.

The plaintiffs seek to foreclose a mortgage securing a demand note for $16,000 without interest, signed by the defendant on October 7, 1940. The answer denies the indebtedness and, by way of cross-complaint, alleges absence of consideration, that the note and mortgage were executed without expectation that they would be collected or become a part of the estate, and that the deceased had agreed to release the mortgage and return the note for cancellation upon the defendant’s request, but had not done so. The defendant therefore seeks a decree declaring the mortgage and note to be without…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City National Bank v. StoeckelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. First National Bank v. National Grain CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  3. Peck v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Palmer v. UhlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API