Boulevard Globe & Lamp Co. v. Kern Incandescent Gaslight Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Garrison, J.
This was an action in contract for the pur-
chase of six thousand lamps. The substantial dispute is over the existence of the contract. The testimony admitted upon this issue was partly documentary and partly oral, consisting of certain letters and the conversations in pursuance of which *280such letters had been written. The oral testimony tended to show that, at the request of the defendant, certain of the letters were written for a purpose other than that which appeared upon their face, and that they had no bearing upon the making of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wharton v. ChristieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sentliffer v. JacobsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Lauter & Co. v. O'TooleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Mason v. HaurandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines v. Unit Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936